<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PrivateEquityFirms.com Blog &#187; -</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/category/pedata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 23:03:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SEOMoz, Most transparent private company on the planet?</title>
		<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2012/05/seomoz-most-transparent-private-company-on-the-planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2012/05/seomoz-most-transparent-private-company-on-the-planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 23:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEOMoz, the Saas startup focused on helping businesses get the most out of their online web presences announced last week that it had raised an $18 million Series B from existing investor Ignition Partners, as well as new investor, Foundry Group.
Funding announcements aren’t terribly interesting as most most press releases don’t provide any insight into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.seomoz.org">SEOMoz</a>, the Saas startup focused on helping businesses get the most out of their online web presences <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/mozs-18-million-venture-financing-our-story-metrics-and-future">announced last week</a> that it had raised an $18 million Series B from existing investor <a href="http://www.ignitionpartners.com">Ignition Partners</a>, as well as new investor, <a href="http://foundrygroup.com">Foundry Group</a>.</p>
<p>Funding announcements aren’t terribly interesting as most most press releases don’t provide any insight into the underlying health or traction of the business. You might see user numbers, but rarely active users or revenue figures.</p>
<p>For example, <a href="http://www.path.com">Path</a>, the mobile social network also just raised a Series B, a whopping $40 million. However, there wasn’t even an official announcement on the story – just <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20120415/confirmed-redpoint-leads-40m-funding-round-for-path/">confirmation</a>. No word on how user count is growing.  Path is maintaining a low profile.</p>
<p>That’s what makes SEOMoz’s story so unique and interesting. While we’re still guessing Path’s number of active users, here’s what we know about SEOMoz &#8211; directly from SEOMoz.</p>
<p><span id="more-146"></span></p>
<p><strong>Financials</strong></p>
<p>Revenue – $11,467,510 for 2011 (projected $18 to $20 million this year)</p>
<p>Net Income – $121k (clear focus on growth)</p>
<p>Pre-money valuation – $75 million (negotiated up from $70 million)</p>
<p>Cash balance prior to funding – $2,172,232.78 (to the penny!)</p>
<p><strong>Marketing</strong></p>
<p>85% of new customer via inbound marketing</p>
<p><strong>Paid Users/New Trial Users</strong></p>
<p>14,619/4,075 (as of March 2012)</p>
<p><strong>Conversion Rate</strong></p>
<p>56% (Trial to Paid User)</p>
<p><strong>Traffic</strong></p>
<p>6.9 million visits in 2012 through April 21.</p>
<p>You can even read emails between SEOMoz CEO Rand Fishkin and Foundry VC Brad Feld and the official pitchbook.  And the list goes on &#8211; use of proceeds, personnel moves, etc.</p>
<p>If you know SEOMoz, the fact that they are so open about their business is nothing new.  Transparency is one of their core values and something they take seriously. Despite the positive news with the recent raise, SEOMoz had a rather frustrating experience going through the same process in 2011.  You can read all about that failed exercise on <a href="http://randfishkin.com/blog/128/misadventures-venture-capital-funding">Rand&#8217;s personal blog</a>.</p>
<p>The interesting thing is that even with SEOMoz&#8217;s continued growth and success, business transparency is most certainly not catching on. Wireframe software provider <a href="http://www.balsamiq.com">Balsamiq</a> might be another notable example, but these companies are rare.  Afterall, disclosing internal performance metrics as a means to success, is something they don&#8217;t teach in business school.  Who knows, perhaps they should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2012/05/seomoz-most-transparent-private-company-on-the-planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2,000 Firms (And Growing)</title>
		<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2012/02/2000-firms-and-growing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2012/02/2000-firms-and-growing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, we achieved a small milestone here at PrivateEquityFirms.com &#8211; crossing the &#8216;magical&#8217; (at least for us) 2,000 firm barrier.  2,000 certainly doesn&#8217;t make us &#8216;complete&#8217;, however it&#8217;s important to note that we&#8217;re constantly adding new firms and aren&#8217;t looking to let up anytime soon.
As for coverage, an often asked question is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, we achieved a small milestone here at PrivateEquityFirms.com &#8211; crossing the &#8216;magical&#8217; (at least for us) 2,000 firm barrier.  2,000 certainly doesn&#8217;t make us &#8216;complete&#8217;, however it&#8217;s important to note that we&#8217;re constantly adding new firms and aren&#8217;t looking to let up anytime soon.<span id="more-133"></span></p>
<p>As for coverage, an often asked question is what&#8217;s our global breakdown? or do we even have international firms?  The answer is &#8216;Yes&#8217;.  The PE industry is certainly US-heavy and our database reflects this.  Of the <strong>2,044</strong> currently listed, <strong>1,366</strong> are US-based (<strong>67%</strong>).  However this percentage has been steadily falling.</p>
<p>If you notice any missing entries, don&#8217;t hesitate to <a href="http://www.privateequityfirms.com/contact.php">let us know</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2012/02/2000-firms-and-growing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SharesPost vs SecondMarket</title>
		<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/10/sharespost-vs-secondmarket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/10/sharespost-vs-secondmarket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SecondMarket and SharesPost serve to facilitate the purchase and sale of illiquid assets and are the largest such exchanges in the rapidly emerging secondary marketplace field (other exchanges include DebtMarket, a specialist in loans and Liquidnet, a recent entrant into the trading of private company shares).  While both SecondMarket and SharesPost deal with the private sale of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="SecondMarket" href="http://www.secondmarket.com">SecondMarket</a> and <a title="Sharespost" href="http://www.sharespost.com" target="_blank">SharesPost</a> serve to facilitate the purchase and sale of illiquid assets and are the largest such exchanges in the rapidly emerging secondary marketplace field (other exchanges include <a title="DebtMarket" href="http://www.debtmarket.com" target="_blank">DebtMarket</a>, a specialist in loans and <a title="Liquidnet" href="http://www.liquidnet.com" target="_blank">Liquidnet</a>, a recent entrant into the trading of private company shares).  While both SecondMarket and SharesPost deal with the private sale of illiquid assets, there are important differences between the two marketplaces.<span id="more-106"></span></p>
<p><strong>Time in Operation/Assets Covered</strong></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>SecondMarket has been in operation for 7 years, since it was founded in 2004 to cater for those who wished to generate liquidity for the restricted securities of public companies. From 2008, SecondMarket began to expand into auction‐rate securities, bankruptcy claims, structured products, limited partnership interests, whole loans, government IOU and private company stock. SharesPost is a newer company, founded just two years ago in 2009. Unlike SecondMarket, which offers a range of marketplaces, SharesPost specializes in selling private company shares only.</p>
<p><strong>Regulations and Requirements</strong></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>SecondMarket is regulated by the SEC, is registered as a broker-dealer and is a member of SIPC, MSRB and FINRA. By contrast, SharesPost is not required to be registered by the SEC as it is a &#8216;passive bulletin board&#8217;.</p>
<p>Both SharesPost and SecondMarket require those who wish to purchase assets through their platforms to meet the qualifications of an &#8216;accredited investor&#8217; a term which is defined by the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.</p>
<p><strong>How They Work</strong></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>SecondMarket uses proprietary algorithms to match buyers and sellers based on the previous trading activities of buyers. They also facilitate negotiation in cases where an immediate decision to purchase cannot be made. Due to its longer time in operation, SecondMarket has a deeper pool of data and relationships which it can use to connect buyers and sellers.</p>
<p>As a passive bulletin board, SharesPost allows buyers and sellers to find appropriate partners and handles trades by partnering with brokers. &#8216;Transaction Specialists&#8217; (expert brokers) can be used by SharesPost clients to facilitate their trades or they can buy and sell shares without guidance. Private placements, such as company offerings and auctions by shareholders are alternative investment routes that are offered by SharesPost.</p>
<p><strong>Charges and Fees</strong></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>While SharesPost allows users to access research reports on its listed companies at no charge, SecondMarket offers both free and paid reports and information.</p>
<p>SecondMarket also charges fees on completed transactions, the amount of which are calculated based on factors including the value of the transaction, the complexity of the transaction and the asset type. The commission is generally between 2  percent and 5 percent of the value of the transaction. SecondMarket places a minimum transaction amount of $100,000, with a minimum commission of $2,500.</p>
<p>The cost of buying shares via SharesPost is made up of a Transaction Specialist fee (if a Transaction Specialist is used) and a U.S. Bank fee for transaction processing and escrow services. The Transaction Specialist fee will cost the greater of $5,000 or 3 percent of the amount of the transaction while the U.S. Bank fee is a flat charge of $1,500 to both the seller and buyer.</p>
<p><strong>Backing</strong></p>
<p>SecondMarket is venture-backed and <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/secondmarket">according to Crunchbase</a>, has raised a total of$19.2 million to date.  This includes a $15 million Series B raised in October of 2010.  SharesPost has not raised a venture round.</p>
<p><strong>Location</strong></p>
<p>SharesPost is based in San Bruno, California, just south of San Francisco.  SecondMarket has a presence in Silicon Valley as well, however, the Firm is headquartered in New York City.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/10/sharespost-vs-secondmarket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Business Traits Private Equity Firms Salivate Over</title>
		<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/10/top-10-business-traits-private-equity-firms-salivate-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/10/top-10-business-traits-private-equity-firms-salivate-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[﻿When private equity firms hunt for acquisitions, they look for business characteristics that minimize risk as they build value and position for a potential exit.  All investment firms break down the key traits that interest them the most.  The challenge of course is finding what they want at a reasonable multiple.   So what business [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿When <a title="Private Equity Firms" href="http://www.privateequityfirms.com">private equity firms</a> hunt for acquisitions, they look for business characteristics that minimize risk as they build value and position for a potential exit.  All investment firms break down the key traits that interest them the most.  The challenge of course is finding what they want at a reasonable multiple.   So what business characteristics do private equity firms covet the most?<span id="more-96"></span></p>
<p><strong>10. Simple</strong></p>
<p>Private equity firms like to invest in businesses that are easy to understand. They need to be able to make a decision about whether or not their investment is going to be profitable, and overcomplication (whether high regulation, advanced technology, etc.) means that they have to spend more of their time and money on due diligence before they can come to a conclusion. All other things being equal, simpler is better.</p>
<p><strong>9. Significant Barriers to Entry</strong></p>
<p>A business that can be easily set up by anyone is a difficult business to be in, as there is nothing to stop other entrepreneurs or investors replicating the successful plan and taking away market share. Barriers to entry, be they capital, technology, staff or even networks make a business more desirable for investors.</p>
<p><strong>8. Low Capital Expenditures</strong></p>
<p>A requirement to constantly reinvest profits in the acquisition of new equipment and similar capital expenditures is a big turn-off for investors.</p>
<p><strong>7. Market Leadership</strong></p>
<p>There are few businesses that do not have any competitors at all, so private equity firms look for the market leaders. Pioneers in a field will be first on the ground with new and improved products and services, meaning that they reap the benefits of offering these developments to customers at an early stage.</p>
<p><strong>6. Strong Management In Place</strong></p>
<p>When purchasing or investing in a business, private equity firms prefer situations where there is already competent business management in place willing to stay. Good management in place can more easily deal with any changes that are instituted by the investors as well as steering staff and processes through the acquisition. Layering in performance based incentives then creates a situation where everyones&#8217; interests are aligned.</p>
<p><strong>5. Growth Potential</strong></p>
<p>The intent of an investment or purchase of a company is always to increase profits over time. It is a better strategy to spend money on a company that has room for growth than one which has reached its peak. After all, this can result in a small initial investment growing to much larger profits and so a better cost-benefit ratio for the investor than spending more money on an equivalent stake in a stagnant company.</p>
<p><strong> 4. Established/Diversified Customers</strong></p>
<p>An established customer base provides a means for the company to make money, and loyal customers allow a greater degree of confidence in the future of the business. The more diverse the customer base the better the opportunities for growth and introduction of new products and services.</p>
<p><strong>3. High Margins</strong></p>
<p>Private equity firms like businesses where there is ample room to streamline operations and increase profits.  Businesses with high margin products offer the most flexibility in terms of finding ways to cut costs and boost the bottom-line and ultimate return on their investment.</p>
<p><strong>2. Unique Products/Services</strong></p>
<p>When private equity firms are deciding on which businesses to invest in, those which are providing something unique will always be highly attractive. A unique selling point generally means limited competition and opens up the possibility of cornering the market and making the business a leader in their field.</p>
<p><strong>1. Recurring Revenue</strong></p>
<p>Private equity firms hate surprises and a business with a locked-in, repeat customer base allows for steadier profits and a greater ability to grow revenues. Businesses with recurring revenue generally command high multiples and are easy to sell.</p>
<p>Missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/10/top-10-business-traits-private-equity-firms-salivate-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Free Private Equity Resources from Across the Web</title>
		<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/10/top-free-private-equity-resources-from-across-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/10/top-free-private-equity-resources-from-across-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


By Zack Miller
There&#8217;s a windfall of information about the private equity industry online.  Here&#8217;s a list of some of the best resources online about the field.
Research
Center for Private Equity and Entrepreneurship: Part of the Big Green’s Tuck School of Business, the Center is an awesome showcase of leading research on the private equity field, covering [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><em>By Zack Miller</em></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a windfall of information about the private equity industry online.  Here&#8217;s a list of some of the best resources online about the field.</p>
<p><strong>Research</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pecenter/">Center for Private Equity and Entrepreneurship</a>: Part of the Big Green’s Tuck School of Business, the Center is an awesome showcase of leading research on the private equity field, covering everything from venture capital to leveraged buyouts.<span id="more-87"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/business/cmbor/privateequity.pdf">Private Equity Demystified: An Explanatory Guide</a> (.pdf): A great overview on how the entire PE industry works with definitions of key terms, explanatory diagrams, and even a detailed (fictional) financial model of a leveraged buy-out.  The research paper starts basic, first addressing  the “what” and then moves into “how” of private equity transactions work.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.quora.com/Private-Equity">Quora on Private Equity</a>: Quora is an amazing site to learn from experts in a variety of fields. and the Q&amp;A on PE is very valuable.  The site’s really a giant forum to ask and answer questions and the quality of professionals in the PE field is extremely high.</p>
<p><strong>Blogs</strong></p>
<p><em>The problem with private equity blogs (and blogs, in general) is that while many of these blogs start out strong with really valuable content, they tend to taper off quite quickly. </em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/">The Private Equiteer</a>: This site is an insider’s guide to the private equity industry, complete with “tips, tricks and trade secrets,&#8221; there’s a ton of info here for newbies and experienced private equity professionals. (Hint: most of the content is available for purchase but if you subscribe to the site’s feed, you can access some of it freely).</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/privateequity/">Private Equity Beat</a>: This blog is part of the <em>Wall Street Journal&#8217;s </em>blog network and provides trends and insights from other Dow Jones products like LBO Wire and Private Equity Analyst.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.carriedinterest.com/">Carried Interest</a>: This blog looks at the business of <a title="Private Equity Firms" href="http://www.privateequityfirms.com">private equity firms</a> as well as the lifestyle of its participants. Written from an Australian’s perspective.</p>
<p><a href="http://equityprivate.typepad.com/">Going Private</a>: <a href="http://equityprivate.typepad.com/">The Sardonic Memoirs of a Private Equity Professional: </a>Unfortunately, there hasn’t been a new post on this blog since 2009, but it deserves mention anyway for all the great information on its pages.</p>
<p><strong>News and Information</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.altassets.com/">AltAssets</a>: The site to follow the daily news flow of global transactions and data on the private equity industry.</p>
<p><a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/">DealBook</a>: Begun as a daily newsletter, <em>The New York Times</em>’ DealBook has become a full-fledged resource for deal makers.  Editor Andrew Ross Sorkin’s attention to quality ensures that news and opinion is top notch.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pehub.com/a/news/">PEHub</a>: This site is an interactive forum for the private equity community.  It’s geared for professionals and not to be upseated by the <em>NYT’s</em> DealBook (see previous entry), PEHub is written by Thomson Reuters Deals Group journalists. Thomson Reuters, by the way, also manages <a href="http://www.buyoutsnews.com/">Buyouts News</a> that does, well, what its name implies.</p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/termsheet/">Term Sheet</a>: Fortune&#8217;s PE/VC news section formed by PEHub founder Dan Primack.</p>
<p><strong>Books</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em> </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Venture-Capital-Private-Equity-Casebook/dp/0471322865"><em>Venture Capital and Private Equity: A Casebook</em></a> (Josh Lerner)</li>
<li><em> </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/King-Capital-Remarkable-Schwarzman-Blackstone/dp/0307452999/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1316161313&amp;sr=1-1"><em>King of Capital: The Remarkable Rise, Fall and Rise Again of Steve Schwarzman and Blackstone</em></a> (Carey, Morris)</li>
<li><em> </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Value-Four-Cornerstones-Corporate-Finance/dp/0470424605/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1316161416&amp;sr=1-1"><em>Value: The Four Cornerstones of Corporate Finance</em></a><em> </em>(McKinsey and Co.)</li>
<li><em> </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Principles-Private-Valuation-Wiley-Finance/dp/047148721X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1316161471&amp;sr=1-1"><em>Principles of Private Firm Valuation</em></a><em> </em>(Stanley Feldman)</li>
<li><em> </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lessons-Private-Equity-Company-Memo/dp/1422124959/ref=sr_1_10?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1316161848&amp;sr=1-10"><em>Lessons from Private Equity Any Company Can Use (Memo to the CEO)</em></a> (Orit Gadiesh)</li>
<li><em> </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Barbarians-Gate-Fall-RJR-Nabisco/dp/0061655554/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1316162020&amp;sr=1-1"><em>Barbarians at the Gate: The Fall of RJR Nabisco</em> </a>(Burrough, Helyar)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Jobs and Careers</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://jobs.efinancialcareers.com/Private_Equity_%7C_Venture_Capital.htm">eFinancialCareers</a>: Job boards specifically for private equity professionals.  It has global career listings.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.Vault.com/">Vault.com</a>: Vault provides career intelligence for various industries but began with a focus on finance and consulting.  There’s a lot of free info on the site and some guides (you&#8217;ll need to pony up some dollars) that can prove very fruitful for a career in private equity: <a href="http://www.vault.com/wps/portal/usa/store/bookdetail?section=cs_finance&amp;item_no=923&amp;origin=com.vault.store.portlet.bookStore$vault.1_win">Vault Guide to Private Equity and Hedge Fund Interview</a>, <a href="http://www.vault.com/wps/portal/usa/store/bookdetail?section=cs_finance&amp;item_no=709&amp;origin=com.vault.store.portlet.bookStore$vault.1_win">Vault Career Guide to Private Equity</a>, and <a href="http://www.vault.com/wps/portal/usa/store/bookdetail?item_no=785">Vault Guide to the Top Private Equity Employers</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fins.com/Finance/SectorProfile.aspx?S=8&amp;SectorName=Private-Equity-VC&amp;Search=A&amp;link=FINS_hp_sectorjobsmodule">FINS Finance</a>: Part of the <em>Wall Street Journal,</em> this site has job listings as well as industry hiring trends, career paths and help on securing a job in PE.</p>
<p><strong>Transactional</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.privateequityclearinghouse.com/">Private Equity Clearinghouse</a>: Own a stake in a partnership or other exempt private equity interest? The Private Equity Clearinghouse is a marketplace that provides liquidity to an otherwise illiquid market for direct investment stakes.  Private equity holders put their equities out for bid to other investors and the transaction is consummated through the system.</p>
<p>For those professionals looking to understand more about the private equity industry, there&#8217;s a ton of data, news, and opinion on the industry to learn from.</p>
<p><em>Zack Miller helps investment businesses grow. He was part of the early team at Seeking Alpha and heads up business development at Covestor. He is the author of the book, Tradestream your Way to Profits: Building a Killer Portfolio in the Age of Social Media (Wiley, 2010) and runs Tradestreaming.com, where investors learn directly from experts.</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/10/top-free-private-equity-resources-from-across-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest buyouts in history, where are they today?</title>
		<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/09/biggest-buyouts-in-history-where-are-they-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/09/biggest-buyouts-in-history-where-are-they-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator> Sam Nelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Mark Di Vincenzo 
When you look at the biggest private equity buyouts in history, it&#8217;s  easy to spot the glory years &#8212; 2006 and 2007, before a severe recession  rocked the nation.
Economists say the recession is behind  us, but we&#8217;re still limping along, and there are fears that the economy  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Mark Di Vincenzo </em></p>
<p><em></em>When you look at the biggest private equity buyouts in history, it&#8217;s  easy to spot the glory years &#8212; 2006 and 2007, before a severe recession  rocked the nation.</p>
<p>Economists say the recession is behind  us, but we&#8217;re still limping along, and there are fears that the economy  may double dip back into a recession. That has kept the deals of the  past three or four years relatively small.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a list of  the 10 biggest private equity buyouts, compiled by <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-biggest-private-equity-deals-in-history-2011-4">BusinessInsider</a>,  and a look at how they&#8217;ve worked out for the <a href="http://www.privateequityfirms.com">private equity firms</a> involved:<span id="more-81"></span></p>
<p>10. KKR bought Alliance Boots in 2007 for $24.8 billion.  The British pharmacy chain is the largest leveraged buyout in  European history. Alliance&#8217;s former CEO, Stefano Pessina, partnered with KKR and took control of the company in 2007.</p>
<p>9.  Blackstone in 2007 paid $26 billion for Hilton Hotels.  The deal made Blackstone the world&#8217;s largest hotelier, but Blackstone  was forced to restructure Hilton&#8217;s debt in 2010. The restructuring deal  makes Blackstone&#8217;s investment look like a smart move.</p>
<p>8.  KKR, Bain Capital and Thomas H. Lee bought ClearChannel in 2006 for  $25.7 billion.  The deal hasn&#8217;t worked out well for the three companies. The masses seem  unwilling to pay for subscription radio, and the stock price for  XM/Sirius &#8212; ClearChannel&#8217;s prized asset &#8212; has plummeted.</p>
<p>7.  Goldman Sachs and TPG Capital bought Alltell in 2007 for $27 billion.  About a year later, Goldman and TPG flipped it, profiting by nearly $3  billion.</p>
<p>6.  Apollo Global Management and TPG bought Harrah&#8217;s Entertainment in 2007 for $27.4 billion.  Apollo and TPG formed Hamlet Holdings and took Harrah&#8217;s private in 2008. Hamlet plans to change the name yet again to Caesars Entertainment and take it public again next year.</p>
<p>5. KKR and TPG bought First Data in 2007 for $29 billion &#8212; the largest technology deal in the history of private equity. First  Data has expanded into Europe and elsewhere.</p>
<p>4. Bain, KKR and Merrill Lynch bought Hospital Corp. of America in 2006 for $32.7 billion. HCA  went public a few years later, raising $3.8 billion, the largest sum ever for a company under the guidance of a private equity  group.</p>
<p>3. Blackstone bought Equity Office Properties in 2007 for  $38.9 billion. Most analysts concluded that Sam Zell got the best of   Steve Schwarzman, especially given that taking over the largest  portfolio of commercial properties in the U.S. meant Blackstone had to  assume Equity Office&#8217;s debt, all $16 billion of it.</p>
<p>2.  KKR, TPG and Goldman Sachs in 2007 paid $44.37 billion for Dallas-based  electric utility company Energy Future Holdings. It will be a good deal  for the new owners, analysts say, if the company can pull off a  successful IPO before long.</p>
<p>1. KKR bought RJR Nabisco in 1989 for  $31.1 billion. The contentious deal spawned the buyout boom that  followed for the next 20 years as well as a best-selling book and a TV  movie, both titled <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbarians_at_the_Gate:_The_Fall_of_RJR_Nabisco">Barbarians at the Gate.</a></em></p>
<p><em>Mark Di Vincenzo is a journalist with 24 years of experience and a New York Times best-selling author.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/09/biggest-buyouts-in-history-where-are-they-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Y Combinator vs TechStars</title>
		<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/09/y-combinator-vs-techstars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/09/y-combinator-vs-techstars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privateequityfirms.com/post/10490690718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent creation of a $24 million TechStars fund that promises to invest $100k into each accepted company (on top of the original $6k to $18k) is a big win for the program and the entrepreneurs vying for one of their coveted spots.  TechStars currently has programs in 4 cities (Boulder &#8211; HQ, Boston, Seattle, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lrw40mzOYg1qcslsn.jpg" alt="" width="343" height="82" align="left" />The recent <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/21/startup-incubator-techstars-raises-24m-increases-funding-for-each-company-by-100k/">creation of a $24 million TechStars fund</a> that promises to invest $100k into each accepted company (on top of the original $6k to $18k) is a big win for the program and the entrepreneurs vying for one of their coveted spots.  <a href="http://www.techstars.com">TechStars</a> currently has programs in 4 cities (Boulder &#8211; HQ, Boston, Seattle, and New York) and altogether pumps 60 businesses through their 3 month, mentorship driven system each year.<span id="more-1"></span><!-- more --></p>
<p>The fund is no doubt aimed squarely at <a href="http://www.ycombinator.com">Y Combinator</a>, the current gold standard for incubators. <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/28/yuri-milner-sv-angel-offer-every-new-y-combinator-startup-150k/">Earlier this year, Y Combinator upped</a> the ante big time against all other similarly styled programs when it announced that accepted teams would have the option of taking an extra $150k at ‘graduation’ (and on very favorable founder terms).</p>
<p>Y Combinator, which had little trouble attracting quality startup teams before the promise of more money, saw record applications as a result.</p>
<p>Now that money isn’t a differentiator with Y Combinator, TechStars, which has somewhat operated in Y Combinator’s shadow, will certainly see increased applications as well.</p>
<p>With so many teams applying, Y Combinator dramatically increased their ‘class’ size to accommodate.  It’ll be interesting to see if TechStars follows suit.</p>
<p>One thing that remains clear in all this, is that the new fund furthers the stranglehold TechStars has (alongside with Y Combinator) as the two most desired fast-track programs to be apart of.</p>
<p><img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lrw3hzw1hC1qcslsn.png" alt="" width="527" height="269" /></p>
<p><em>Source: Google Trends</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/09/y-combinator-vs-techstars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DST not interested in Dropbox?</title>
		<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/08/9631730125/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/08/9631730125/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privateequityfirms.com/post/9631730125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or is it the other way around? Rumors of a mega VC raise for popular file storage service Dropbox have been swirling in recent weeks and TechCrunch now confirms that Index Ventures is leading a round which values the 4 year-old startup at $4 billion.

The participants involved and the exact size of the round is still a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqszmapGjg1qcslsn.png" alt="" align="left" />Or is it the other way around? Rumors of a mega VC raise for popular file storage service Dropbox have been swirling in recent weeks and <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/30/index-leads-4-billion-valuation-round-in-dropbox/" target="_self">TechCrunch now confirms</a> that Index Ventures is leading a round which values the 4 year-old startup at $4 billion.<span id="more-32"></span><br />
<!-- more --></p>
<p>The participants involved and the exact size of the round is still a mystery but notably absent in all the press coverage is Yuri Milner’s group DST.</p>
<p>Given DST’s participation in most of the mega VC rounds of late, including Spotify, Airbnb, and Groupon just this year, it’s somewhat surprising DST’s name hasn’t come up.</p>
<p>As more details emerge, things could certainly change, but when one reads about $1 billion + VC valuation rounds, it’s hard not to think of DST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/08/9631730125/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How common is the CFA designation amongst private equity pros?</title>
		<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/07/how-common-is-the-cfa-designation-amongst-private-equity-pros/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/07/how-common-is-the-cfa-designation-amongst-private-equity-pros/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privateequityfirms.com/post/7247970170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Requiring 4 years of qualified professional experience and the passage of three, grueling 6-hour exams, the CFA Charterholder designation is not an easy qualification to obtain.  As such, there are only 90,000 charterholders around the world. Doing a quick search of ‘CFA’ amongst the 14,500+ junior to senior PE professionals in the PrivateEquityFirms.com database yields [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lnu5knzck91qcslsn.png" alt="" align="left" />Requiring 4 years of qualified professional experience and the passage of three, grueling 6-hour exams, the CFA Charterholder designation is not an easy qualification to obtain.  As such, there are only <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartered_Financial_Analyst" target="_blank">90,000 </a><span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartered_Financial_Analyst" target="_blank">charterholders around the world</a>.</span> <!-- more -->Doing a quick search of ‘CFA’ amongst the 14,500+ junior to senior PE professionals in the <a title="Private Equity Firms" href="http://www.privateequityfirms.com">PrivateEquityFirms.com</a> database yields roughly 300 of them (2% of all database entries and 0.33% of all charterholders).<span id="more-33"></span></p>
<p>While the pursuit of the CFA designation certainly won’t hurt your PE prospects (you’d be in pretty exclusive company), it would appear that it’s not as common or necessary as one might expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/07/how-common-is-the-cfa-designation-amongst-private-equity-pros/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Product Update: Simple &#8216;My Projects&#8217; feature proving popular</title>
		<link>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/06/product-update-simple-my-projects-feature-proving-popular/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/06/product-update-simple-my-projects-feature-proving-popular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privateequityfirms.com/post/6727852951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s been a couple of months since our recent makeover and one feature that’s proven quite popular with new and existing users is the ability to create simple project lists of private equity ‘Firms’, ‘Portfolio Companies’, and/or private equity ‘Professionals’, one record at a time. Currently, we provide four unique lists for each type of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been a couple of months since our recent makeover and one feature that’s proven quite popular with new and existing users is the ability to create simple project lists of private equity ‘Firms’, ‘Portfolio Companies’, and/or private equity ‘Professionals’, one record at a time. Currently, we provide four unique lists for each type of data (see below).<span id="more-4"></span><br />
<!-- more --></p>
<p>While users can also save searches, the project list feature was intended to allow users to create very specific/custom lists for later review or export. Saving general searches is great, but may include data that is not a close fit for the task at hand.</p>
<p>Since the site redo, over 8,000 pieces of data have been added to these lists.</p>
<p><img src="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ln3o12VrSV1qcslsn.png" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privateequityfirms.com/blog/2011/06/product-update-simple-my-projects-feature-proving-popular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

